491st

Main Menu

  • Home
  • American army
  • American military
  • American government
  • American company

491st

Header Banner

491st

  • Home
  • American army
  • American military
  • American government
  • American company
American army
Home›American army›Army soldier cleared of charges related to mysterious shooting in Syria

Army soldier cleared of charges related to mysterious shooting in Syria

By Brandi J. Williams
January 8, 2022
0
0

Army paratrooper charged with misconduct that led to a brief shootout in 2020 between US troops and pro-regime forces in Syria has been cleared of all charges during a court martial in Fort Bragg, Carolina North, Friday.

Sgt. 1st Class Robert Nicoson, who was a Platoon Sergeant with the Blackhorse Troop of the 82nd Airborne Division, 1st Squadron, 73rd Cavalry Regiment, in the incident of August 17, 2020, was found not guilty on seven counts by a jury made up of two lieutenant-colonels and six command sergeant-majors, according to his lawyer Phil Stackhouse. An eighth charge was dropped during the proof phase.

About eight months after his soldiers engaged Syrian troops at a checkpoint near Tal Az-Zahab, the military accused Nicoson of breaking orders, recklessly endangering, making unlawful threats. and obstruction of justice. Prosecutors accused Nicoson of approaching the checkpoint without permission, threatening to kill pro-regime forces if they were not allowed to pass, then ordering soldiers to remove video footage of the incident and to “falsely claim” that pro-regime forces had granted them safe passage.

Onlookers captured video and photos of the incident which were later posted on social media.

يظهر الاشتباك عناصر من # الجيش_السوري ات الاحتلال الأميركي اثناء الدورية الامريكية واعتراضهم عناصر حاجز الجيش في # تل_الذهب ?? # القامشلي
لتقوم بعدها مروحيتان للاحتلال الأميركي عناصر الحاجز ما لاستشهاد وإصابة إثنين pic.twitter.com/kjhgPSSZyG

– الد اسكيف (@khalediskef) August 17, 2020

للحاجز الجيش السوري الذي تم استهدافه ل طيران التحالف الدولي ل الذهب الواقعة بالقرب احية تل براك جنوب مديقو قامللل pic.twitter.com/U5aSV5COKK

– roj ava (@ SRRSLqHbYTuh566) August 17, 2020

It is not known exactly what happened that day. US military officials issued a brief statement after the incident, claiming that a “patrol came under small arms fire” from individuals near the checkpoint and said the Americans “retaliated in the event of an attack. self-defense “during the 10-minute exchange of fire. Meanwhile, reports from a Syrian Civil War Watch Group and state-run Syrian media claimed that US forces killed one Syrian and injured two others after calling for reinforcements from gunships, which US officials have denied.

“The coalition did not carry out an airstrike,” said an Aug. 17, 2020 statement from Operation Inherent Resolve. “No casualties occurred. The coalition patrol returned to base. The incident is still under investigation.

Ultimately, the jury sided with Nicoson’s version of events after two hours of deliberation, according to Stackhouse, who said the “combat experienced” panel heard a week of testimony from over 20 years ago. witnesses.

What will happen next for Nicoson, or whether he will regain his full service status, remains unclear. Officials in Fort Bragg did not respond to an email from Task & Purpose requesting comment.

“Sergeant First Class Nicoson and his family continue to be humble and grateful to those who supported him and stood by his side,” Stackhouse said.

Read more on Task and objective

Want to write for the task and the purpose? Click here. Or check out the latest stories on our home page.

Categories

  • American army
  • American company
  • American government
  • American military

Recent Posts

  • Trial opens for Army reservist accused of storming the Capitol
  • Hailing from Tyler, US Army veteran injured in combat in Ukraine
  • An army veteran served as a tank commander in the Vietnam War
  • Why Combat Dive School is the toughest US Army Special Forces course
  • US military plans to let LGBTQ+ troops out of hostile states

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • July 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • April 2018
  • January 2018
  • May 2017
  • June 2016
  • April 2016
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • March 2015
  • October 2014
  • June 2014
  • October 2012
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions